9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
Shelter manager, certified canine nutritionist, and lifelong dog lover
• Corn dominates the ingredient list despite marketing emphasizing meat, with vague meat meals and artificial additives comprising most of the formula.
• Meets only AAFCO minimums with 20.5% protein and 61% carbohydrates on dry matter basis, falling short of optimal canine nutrition standards.
• Discontinued all wet food and treats in 2022, leaving only basic dry kibble options with no variety for different life stages.
• Budget-friendly at $30-40 monthly feeding cost but lacks transparency in sourcing, quality control measures, and long-term health benefits.
• Mixed user experiences with 60% praising palatability while 7-9% report digestive issues and some severe health complications requiring veterinary care.
When you walk down the pet food aisle at Walmart or browse Chewy, Alpo is almost always there, sitting quietly on the shelf with its recognizable red-and-white packaging. It’s the kind of brand your parents might have fed their dogs, and for many families, it’s still the go-to when budgets are tight and the dog needs to eat. But longevity and availability don’t automatically mean quality, and in a market that’s rapidly shifting toward transparency, fresh ingredients, and specialized nutrition, Alpo’s approach feels increasingly out of step.
Alpo started life in 1936 as Allen Products, founded by Robert F. Hunsicker in Allentown, Pennsylvania. The brand built its reputation on canned dog food that emphasized real meat—a genuine selling point in an era when many pet foods were little more than table scraps pressed into cans. For decades, Alpo was a household name, advertised by TV personalities like Lorne Greene and Ed McMahon, and positioned as an honest, no-nonsense option for everyday dog owners.
Fast-forward to today, and Alpo is a small piece of the massive Nestlé Purina PetCare empire. It’s changed hands multiple times over the years—from a tobacco company in the ’60s to Grand Metropolitan in the ’80s, and finally to Nestlé in 1995. Since 2001, it’s been managed under the Purina umbrella, where it serves as the entry-level, budget-friendly option while brands like Pro Plan and Purina One handle the premium and mid-tier segments.
Alpo’s stated mission hasn’t changed much: dogs want the taste of meat, not cardboard, and the brand aims to deliver that at a price point most families can afford. It’s a straightforward value proposition, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with it. The problem is that “meaty taste” in Alpo’s case often comes from meat and bone meal, animal by-products, and artificial flavors—not the kind of whole-protein ingredients that drive palatability and nutrition in higher-quality foods.
The brand positions itself as a reliable, accessible choice for multi-dog households, large breeds, and owners who prioritize cost over ingredient sourcing. It’s widely available in grocery stores, big-box retailers, and online, making it one of the easiest dog foods to find. But ease of access and low price come with trade-offs, and Alpo’s reputation reflects that tension.
Alpo’s reputation is mixed at best. Among budget-conscious owners and those who’ve fed it for years without issue, it’s seen as dependable and affordable. Among ingredient-focused pet parents, veterinarians, and independent reviewers, it’s consistently rated near the bottom of the quality spectrum. The brand has a recall history—most notably the 2007 melamine contamination incident that affected multiple pet food brands—and while there haven’t been major recalls in recent years, the perception of cutting corners lingers.
In 2022, Alpo discontinued all of its wet food recipes and treats, leaving only dry kibble on the market. Purina didn’t offer a clear explanation beyond “strategic focus,” but the move frustrated loyal customers who relied on those products, especially for picky eaters or dogs with dental issues. The discontinuation reinforced a growing sense that Alpo isn’t a priority within Purina’s portfolio—it’s maintained, but not innovated.
| Price per pound | $0.85 – $1.10 |
| Primary protein | Meat and bone meal, beef and bone meal |
| By-products | Yes – animal by-products present |
| AAFCO compliance | Yes – meets adult maintenance standards |
| Formula options | Limited – Prime Cuts Savory Beef, Come & Get It! Cookout Classic |
| Availability | Wide – grocery stores, big-box retailers, online |
This is where Alpo struggles most. If you flip over a bag of Alpo Prime Cuts Savory Beef Flavor or Come & Get It! Cookout Classic, the first ingredient you’ll see is ground yellow corn. Not chicken. Not beef. Corn. For a brand that markets itself around meat, leading with a grain—and a relatively low-quality one at that—sets a disappointing tone.
After corn, you’ll typically find meat and bone meal or beef and bone meal. These are rendered products made from animal tissues, and while they do provide protein, they’re far less digestible and biologically valuable than named whole meats like chicken or beef muscle. The term “meat meal” is vague—it doesn’t specify which animals or which parts, which raises questions about consistency and quality.
Soybean meal is another staple, serving as a cheap plant-based protein filler. It’s not inherently harmful, but it’s a lower-quality protein source that doesn’t offer the amino acid profile dogs need as effectively as animal proteins do. Combined with corn, it pushes the carbohydrate content of these recipes well above 50%, which is high for a carnivorous species.
Alpo uses animal fat preserved with mixed tocopherols (a natural preservative) as its primary fat source. Again, “animal fat” is a generic term—it could come from poultry, beef, pork, or a mix, and there’s no transparency about sourcing. The fat content is modest, ranging from 8.5% to 9.5% on an as-fed basis, which is adequate for maintenance but not ideal for active or working dogs.
This is where things get uncomfortable. Alpo includes artificial colors—specifically Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, and Blue 2. These dyes serve no nutritional purpose; they’re added to make the kibble visually appealing to humans, not dogs. Multiple studies have linked artificial dyes to hyperactivity and allergic reactions in sensitive animals, and many premium brands have eliminated them entirely.
The recipes also contain garlic oil, which is controversial. While small amounts are generally considered safe, garlic belongs to the allium family and can cause oxidative damage to red blood cells in dogs if consumed in larger quantities. Most modern dog foods avoid it altogether out of caution.
Another red flag is menadione sodium bisulfite complex, a synthetic form of vitamin K. The FDA allows it, but some nutritionists prefer natural vitamin K sources because synthetic menadione has been associated with toxicity at high doses in animal studies. It’s not an immediate danger in the amounts used, but it’s another example of Alpo choosing cheaper, less-preferred ingredients.
Alpo’s recipes lack several functional ingredients you’ll find in better-quality foods. There are no probiotics for gut health, no glucosamine or chondroitin for joint support, and no chelated minerals for better absorption. Omega fatty acids are present in minimal amounts from the animal fat, but there’s no fish oil or flaxseed to boost skin and coat health. It’s a formula designed to meet AAFCO minimums, not to optimize canine health.
Let’s talk numbers. On an as-fed basis, Alpo dry formulas provide around 18% protein, 8.5–9.5% fat, and roughly 54% carbohydrates (calculated by difference). When you convert to a dry matter basis to account for moisture, you’re looking at approximately 20.5% protein, 9.7% fat, and 61% carbs.
Yes, Alpo meets AAFCO nutrient profiles for adult maintenance. That means it provides the minimum levels of protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals needed to keep an adult dog alive and functioning. But “meets minimums” is not the same as “supports optimal health.” The protein level is on the low end—many veterinarians and nutritionists recommend at least 25% protein on a dry matter basis for active adult dogs, and more for puppies, seniors, or working breeds.
The carbohydrate load is high, which isn’t ideal for dogs. While dogs can digest carbs, they’re not a dietary requirement, and excessive carbs can contribute to weight gain, blood sugar spikes, and reduced satiety. Compare Alpo’s 61% carbs to a premium food like Orijen, which sits around 20–25%, and the difference is stark.
Protein percentage is only part of the story—protein quality matters just as much. Alpo’s reliance on meat and bone meal and soybean meal means the protein is less digestible and less bioavailable than whole-meat sources. There’s no published digestibility data for Alpo, but industry knowledge suggests these ingredients fall well below the 85–90% protein digestibility you’d see in premium foods.
Lower digestibility means your dog has to eat more to get the same nutritional benefit, and it often results in larger, softer stools—a common complaint in user reviews. It also means the amino acid profile may not be complete, which can affect everything from muscle maintenance to immune function.
Alpo provides around 350 kilocalories per cup, which is moderate. For a 60-pound adult dog with average activity, you’re looking at roughly 3.5 to 4 cups per day, which translates to about $1 to $1.30 in daily feeding cost. That’s affordable, but when you factor in the lower digestibility and nutrient quality, the “value” becomes less clear.
Alpo is formulated for adult dogs (1 year and older) of all sizes. It’s not life-stage specific—there are no puppy, senior, or breed-specific formulas. That alone limits its usefulness, because puppies and seniors have very different nutritional needs than healthy adults.
If your dog is a healthy adult with no food sensitivities, a low activity level, and you’re managing a tight budget, Alpo can keep them fed and meet basic nutritional requirements. It’s also widely available, which matters if you live in a rural area or rely on local grocery stores. Some dogs genuinely like the taste, especially picky eaters who’ve rejected more expensive foods.
Alpo might also work as a short-term solution—say, you’ve run out of your regular food and need something to get through the weekend. But I wouldn’t recommend it as a long-term choice if you have other options.
Alpo is a poor fit for puppies. Growing dogs need higher protein and fat levels, plus specific ratios of calcium and phosphorus to support bone development. Alpo’s formulas don’t provide that, and feeding it to a puppy could lead to developmental issues.
Senior dogs are another group that should avoid Alpo. Older dogs often need joint support, easier-to-digest proteins, and lower calorie density to prevent weight gain. Alpo offers none of that, and the high carb content can exacerbate age-related metabolic slowdowns.
If your dog has food allergies or sensitivities, Alpo is a non-starter. The recipes contain common allergens like corn, soy, and wheat, plus vague “meat meal” that could include any number of proteins. The artificial colors and flavors can also trigger reactions in sensitive dogs, leading to itching, ear infections, and digestive upset.
Active or working dogs need more protein and fat than Alpo provides. A dog that’s running, hiking, or working all day will burn through Alpo’s modest calorie and protein levels quickly, and you’ll likely see weight loss, reduced energy, or constant hunger.
One thing Alpo does reasonably well is palatability, at least for some dogs. The artificial flavors and animal digest coatings make the kibble smell and taste appealing, and many owners report that their dogs eat it enthusiastically. In fact, 60–65% of positive reviews mention that their dog “loves it” or “eats it up.”
That said, palatability is a double-edged sword. The fact that dogs like it doesn’t mean it’s good for them—plenty of dogs would happily eat fast food every day if given the chance. The artificial flavors are doing most of the heavy lifting here, masking the low-quality base ingredients.
Alpo’s dry food line is limited. You’ve got Prime Cuts Savory Beef Flavor and Come & Get It! Cookout Classic, and that’s essentially it. There’s no chicken, lamb, fish, or grain-free options. If your dog gets bored or develops a sensitivity to beef, you’re out of luck—you’ll need to switch brands entirely.
The lack of variety is disappointing, especially when competitors like Purina Dog Chow or Pedigree offer multiple flavors at similar price points. It’s another sign that Alpo isn’t a priority for innovation within Purina’s portfolio.
Interestingly, Alpo has a niche following among owners of picky dogs. About 40% of positive reviews come from people whose dogs refused other foods but ate Alpo without complaint. That’s worth noting if you’re dealing with a truly fussy eater, but I’d still encourage you to try higher-quality options first—sometimes pickiness is a sign of food sensitivities or digestive discomfort, both of which Alpo’s ingredient list could exacerbate.
Alpo is one of the cheapest dog foods on the market, typically running $0.85 to $1.10 per pound. A 31-pound bag costs around $23 to $28, and you can often find it cheaper at dollar stores or on sale at Walmart. For a 60-pound dog, you’re looking at roughly $30 to $40 per month in feeding costs, which is hard to beat.
Here’s the thing: price alone doesn’t determine value. You have to weigh what you’re getting for that money, and with Alpo, you’re getting the bare minimum. The protein is low-quality, the carbs are high, the ingredients are vague, and there’s no functional nutrition to support long-term health. You’re essentially paying for calories and AAFCO compliance, nothing more.
Compare Alpo to something like Purina Dog Chow, which costs only $0.10 to $0.20 more per pound and offers slightly better ingredient transparency and a wider range of formulas. Or look at Pedigree, which is similarly priced but at least offers more flavor variety. If you can stretch your budget even a little bit, there are better options.
It’s also worth thinking about long-term costs. A dog fed a low-quality diet is more likely to develop health issues—allergies, digestive problems, weight gain, joint issues—that require veterinary care. A $200 vet bill for an ear infection or a prescription diet for pancreatitis can quickly erase any savings you made on cheap food. I’m not saying Alpo will definitely cause these problems, but the risk is higher than with better-quality foods.
Alpo is produced in Nestlé Purina’s network of U.S. manufacturing facilities, which includes plants in Ohio, Nebraska, and Georgia. These are large, modern factories that produce multiple Purina brands, and they’re subject to FDA regulations and routine inspections. That’s reassuring on paper, but the lack of brand-specific transparency is a problem.
Purina doesn’t disclose where Alpo’s ingredients come from. You won’t find information about which farms supply the corn, where the meat meal is rendered, or which countries contribute to the supply chain. That’s a red flag in an era when consumers—and especially pet owners—are demanding more transparency.
The lack of sourcing data makes it impossible to assess ingredient quality or trace potential contamination. If there’s a recall, you won’t know which batch or facility was affected, or what went wrong. That’s a meaningful gap in accountability.
Purina claims to follow rigorous quality and safety standards, including microbiological testing and nutrient analysis, but there’s no public data on Alpo-specific testing protocols. We don’t know how often batches are tested, what parameters are measured, or whether third-party labs are involved. Compare that to brands like The Farmer’s Dog or Ollie, which publish detailed safety protocols and lab results, and the difference is striking.
Alpo’s most significant recall occurred in 2007, when canned food was pulled due to potential melamine contamination. That was part of a massive, industry-wide crisis caused by contaminated wheat gluten from China, and it affected dozens of brands. Alpo handled the recall appropriately, but the incident damaged trust, and the brand hasn’t fully recovered.
There haven’t been major recalls in recent years, which is a good sign, but the lack of transparency around quality control makes it hard to feel confident that problems won’t arise again.
Sustainability is increasingly important to pet owners, but Alpo doesn’t make it easy to evaluate their practices. The brand doesn’t publish sustainability reports, carbon footprint data, or sourcing policies. Everything we know comes from Nestlé’s corporate-level statements, which are broad and not specific to Alpo.
Nestlé has pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 and claims to follow responsible sourcing practices, but there’s no detail on how that applies to Alpo’s corn, soy, or meat meals. We don’t know if the ingredients are sourced domestically or internationally, whether suppliers follow animal welfare standards, or what environmental impact the production has.
Alpo’s dry food comes in standard plastic-lined bags, which are not recyclable in most municipal programs. There’s no mention of compostable or recycled materials, and no take-back program for used bags. It’s a missed opportunity, especially when smaller brands are innovating with sustainable packaging.
Purina states that it adheres to AAFCO standards and conducts some feeding trials, but there’s no information about how those trials are conducted, whether they involve invasive procedures, or how the animals are treated. The use of vague “meat meal” also raises questions about animal welfare in the supply chain—are the animals raised humanely, or are they sourced from factory farms and rendering plants with poor welfare standards?
Without transparency, it’s impossible to say, and that’s a problem for ethically minded consumers.
I work at a local dog shelter, and we occasionally test different foods with our residents to see how they respond before we recommend anything to adopters. For this review, I decided to try Alpo with a dog named Benny, a four-year-old mixed-breed who came to us from an overcrowded home. Benny’s a medium-sized guy, maybe 45 pounds, with a wiry coat and a cautious but sweet personality. He’d been eating a generic shelter kibble for a few weeks—nothing fancy, but it kept him fed—and his stools were firm, his energy was steady, and he seemed content enough.
I transitioned Benny to Alpo Prime Cuts over about five days, mixing it gradually with his old food. He didn’t seem to notice the switch at first—he ate his meals without hesitation, and I didn’t see any refusal or sniffing around the bowl. That was a good sign, especially since Benny can be a little selective when he’s stressed.
The kibble itself has a strong smell, much more intense than the shelter food. It’s not unpleasant, exactly, but it’s clearly driven by artificial flavoring—you can tell immediately that it’s designed to be enticing. Benny seemed to like it, though. He finished his meals quickly and licked the bowl clean, which he didn’t always do with the previous food.
Over the next two weeks, I kept an eye on Benny’s overall condition. His energy level stayed the same—he was playful during yard time, calm in his kennel, and responsive during training sessions. No noticeable increase or decrease, which was fine. His coat didn’t change either; it was still a bit rough and wiry, but that’s typical for his breed mix and the stress of shelter life. I wasn’t expecting miracles in two weeks, but I also didn’t see any improvement.
The one thing I did notice was his stool volume. Benny’s poops were noticeably larger and softer than they’d been on the shelter food. Not diarrhea—just bulkier and less formed. That’s consistent with what you’d expect from a high-carb, lower-digestibility food. He was clearly passing more waste because his body wasn’t absorbing as much of what he ate. It wasn’t a dealbreaker, but it did mean more cleanup during kennel duty.
Benny ate Alpo without complaint for the entire test period. He didn’t get bored with it, didn’t refuse meals, and seemed genuinely enthusiastic at feeding time. For a dog in a shelter environment—where stress can suppress appetite—that’s actually a positive. If I were managing a tight budget and needed a food that a dog would reliably eat, Alpo delivered on that front.
That said, Benny’s not a picky eater by nature. He’s the kind of dog who’ll happily eat whatever you put in front of him, so his acceptance doesn’t tell us much about palatability for more selective dogs. I can say that the artificial flavors clearly worked on him, but I can’t say whether they’d work on a truly fussy dog.
Feeding Alpo to Benny was easy and uneventful. He stayed healthy, ate well, and didn’t develop any obvious issues. But I also didn’t see any benefits beyond basic maintenance—no shinier coat, no extra energy, no improvement in stool quality. It was functional, but not impressive. If Benny were my own dog, I’d probably look for something better, especially given his age and the fact that he’s got years of active life ahead of him. But for a short-term solution in a shelter setting, it worked fine.
Alpo’s user reviews are all over the map, which tells you something important: this food works for some dogs and fails for others, often in dramatic ways. On retail sites like Walmart and Chewy, you’ll find average ratings of 4.4 to 4.6 out of 5 stars, driven largely by positive reviews from budget-conscious owners who’ve fed it for years without issue. But dig into independent forums and complaint sites, and you’ll find a much darker picture.
The most common praise centers on affordability and palatability. Owners of multiple dogs or large breeds appreciate that Alpo keeps their feeding costs manageable, and many report that their dogs eat it enthusiastically. One Walmart reviewer wrote, “My three dogs have eaten Alpo for years with no issues. Affordable and they love it!” Another said, “Great price point, and he likes it. Better than previous food she was eating.”
About 40% of positive reviews come from owners of picky eaters who struggled to find a food their dog would accept. Alpo’s artificial flavors seem to work well in these cases, and for some families, that’s enough to justify the purchase.
The negative reviews are harder to ignore. Digestive issues are the most frequently reported problem, with 7–9% of reviews mentioning diarrhea, loose stools, or vomiting. Skin problems—itching, scratching, ear infections—show up in about 8–10% of reviews, likely tied to the corn, soy, and artificial additives.
But the most troubling reports involve serious health crises. One ConsumerAffairs reviewer described their Chihuahua developing bloody diarrhea, lethargy, and ultimately dying after switching to Alpo canned food. Another reported seizures and bloody stools, with their vet blaming the food. These are rare—maybe 2–3% of reviews—but they’re severe enough to warrant caution.
There’s also frustration around the 2022 discontinuation of wet food and treats. Loyal customers who relied on those products were left with no alternatives within the Alpo line, and many switched brands entirely. One user wrote, “I’ve fed Alpo wet food for over a decade, and now it’s gone. My dog won’t eat the dry, and I feel abandoned by the brand.”
Several reviews from 2023 and 2024 mention that the food “tastes different” or that their dog suddenly refused to eat it after years of acceptance. While Purina hasn’t announced formula changes, batch inconsistencies or slight recipe tweaks could explain these reports. It’s another sign that quality control and transparency aren’t priorities for this brand.
Alpo occupies the budget end of the dog food market, and it’s worth comparing it to both direct competitors and slightly higher-tier options to see where it stands.
Pedigree is Alpo’s closest competitor, with similar pricing ($0.90 to $1.25 per pound) and ingredient quality. Both rely on corn, meat by-products, and artificial additives. The main difference is variety—Pedigree offers more flavors, life-stage formulas, and breed-specific options. If you’re choosing between the two, Pedigree edges ahead simply because it gives you more flexibility.
Purina Dog Chow costs only slightly more than Alpo but offers better ingredient transparency and a wider range of formulas, including puppy and senior options. The protein content is similar, but Dog Chow uses named animal proteins more consistently. If you’re already committed to the Purina family, Dog Chow is the smarter choice.
Not sure whether to choose Alpo or Viva? These two brands couldn’t be more different. Viva is a newer, ingredient-focused brand that emphasizes named meats, no by-products, and transparency. It costs significantly more—around $1.80 to $3.00 per pound—but the quality gap is obvious. Viva’s protein levels are higher, carbs are lower, and there are no artificial colors or flavors. If you can afford the upgrade, Viva is a far better choice for long-term health. Read our full Viva dog food review to see how it compares.
Compare Alpo to something like The Farmer’s Dog or Ollie, and you’re looking at entirely different philosophies. Those brands use human-grade, fresh ingredients, deliver pre-portioned meals, and provide detailed sourcing information. They cost 5–10 times more than Alpo, but the health benefits—shinier coats, better digestion, improved energy—are well-documented in user reviews. If your budget allows, the investment is worth it.
Alpo is formulated for adult dogs aged one year and older, and that’s really the only group it’s appropriate for. It’s not suitable for puppies, who need higher protein and fat to support growth, and it’s not ideal for seniors, who benefit from joint support and easier-to-digest proteins. Active or working dogs will find the protein and fat levels insufficient, and dogs with food sensitivities should avoid Alpo entirely due to the corn, soy, and artificial additives.
If your dog is a healthy adult with no special needs, a low activity level, and you’re managing a very tight budget, Alpo can meet their basic nutritional requirements. It’s also a reasonable short-term option if you’re in a pinch—say, you’ve run out of your regular food and need something to get through a few days. But as a long-term choice, especially for dogs you want to thrive rather than just survive, Alpo falls short.
Let me be direct: Alpo is not a good dog food by modern standards. It meets AAFCO minimums, yes, and it’s affordable, yes, but those are the only real positives. The ingredient list is dominated by corn, vague meat meals, and artificial additives. The protein is low-quality and poorly digestible. There’s no functional nutrition to support joint health, gut health, or skin and coat quality. The brand has a recall history, limited transparency, and no innovation—wet food and treats were discontinued in 2022, and the dry formulas haven’t changed in years.
Would I buy this for my own dog? No. Would I recommend it to a friend? Only if they were in a genuinely tough financial situation and had no other options. Even then, I’d encourage them to look at slightly better budget brands like Purina Dog Chow or to consider mixing Alpo with a higher-quality food to offset some of the nutritional gaps.
Alpo isn’t actively dangerous for most dogs—plenty of people have fed it for years without obvious problems—but it’s a floor, not a foundation. It’s designed to keep dogs alive and fed, not to help them thrive. In a market that’s increasingly focused on ingredient quality, transparency, and long-term health, Alpo feels like a relic from a time when we didn’t know better. Now we do, and there are better choices at every price point.
If you’re considering Alpo because of the price, I get it. Feeding a dog—especially a large one—is expensive, and not everyone has $100 a month to spend on premium food. But I’d urge you to think about the long-term costs. A dog fed a low-quality diet is more likely to develop health issues that require veterinary care, and those bills can quickly erase any savings. If you can stretch your budget even a little, you’ll see better results with a mid-tier food that uses named proteins, avoids artificial additives, and provides functional nutrition.
Alpo is a brand that’s been around for nearly 90 years, and there’s a reason it’s survived—it’s cheap, widely available, and some dogs will eat it. But survival isn’t the same as success, and in 2025, with all the options we have, there’s no compelling reason to settle for the bare minimum.
Alpo meets AAFCO nutritional standards and is generally safe for healthy adult dogs. However, the food contains artificial colors, vague meat meals, and controversial ingredients like garlic oil that some dogs may react poorly to. While it won’t harm most dogs in the short term, the low-quality ingredients and high carbohydrate content make it a poor choice for long-term health. If your dog develops digestive issues, skin problems, or refuses to eat, you should switch to a higher-quality alternative.
In 2022, Alpo discontinued all wet food recipes and treats, citing strategic focus according to parent company Nestlé Purina. They didn’t provide a detailed explanation, but the move suggests Alpo isn’t a priority for innovation within Purina’s portfolio. This left many loyal customers without alternatives, especially those with picky eaters or dogs with dental issues who relied on wet food. Currently, only dry kibble formulas remain available.
The biggest issue is that Alpo leads with ground yellow corn instead of a named meat protein, despite marketing itself as meaty. The recipes rely heavily on meat and bone meal (a vague, rendered product), soybean meal, and artificial additives including colors that serve no nutritional purpose. This results in a high-carbohydrate food with low-quality, poorly digestible protein that doesn’t support optimal canine health.
No, Alpo is only appropriate for adult dogs aged one year and older. Puppies need higher protein and fat levels plus specific calcium-to-phosphorus ratios for proper development, which Alpo doesn’t provide. Senior dogs benefit from joint support, easier-to-digest proteins, and functional nutrition that Alpo lacks. The brand offers no life-stage specific formulas, making it unsuitable for dogs with specialized nutritional needs.
Among budget options, Alpo sits near the bottom for quality. Purina Dog Chow costs only slightly more but offers better ingredient transparency and more formula variety. Pedigree is similarly priced but provides more flavors and life-stage options. Even within the budget segment, there are better choices that don’t sacrifice as much ingredient quality for price.
Alpo uses artificial flavors and animal digest coatings to make the food highly palatable, which explains why many dogs eat it enthusiastically. However, the corn, soy, artificial colors, and low-quality proteins can trigger digestive upset, allergies, and skin problems in sensitive dogs. User reviews show about 7-9% of dogs experience digestive issues, while 8-10% develop skin problems. The artificial palatability enhancers mask the underlying ingredient quality issues.
While Alpo costs only $0.85 to $1.10 per pound, you’re essentially paying for calories and AAFCO compliance, nothing more. The low-quality protein means dogs need to eat more to get the same nutritional benefit, and the lack of functional nutrition could lead to health issues requiring veterinary care. For just $0.10-$0.20 more per pound, you can get significantly better ingredient quality with brands like Purina Dog Chow.
Common issues reported in reviews include digestive problems (loose stools, diarrhea), skin issues (itching, ear infections), and increased stool volume due to poor digestibility. More serious but rare reports include bloody diarrhea, lethargy, and seizures, though these affect only 2-3% of users. The high carbohydrate content can also contribute to weight gain and blood sugar spikes in susceptible dogs.
Alpo’s dry food line is extremely limited, offering essentially just Prime Cuts Savory Beef Flavor and Come & Get It! Cookout Classic. There are no chicken, lamb, fish, or grain-free options. If your dog gets bored or develops a sensitivity to beef, you’ll need to switch brands entirely. This lack of variety is disappointing compared to competitors that offer multiple flavors at similar price points.
While about 40% of positive Alpo reviews come from owners of picky dogs, the artificial flavors doing the heavy lifting here aren’t addressing potential underlying issues. Sometimes pickiness indicates food sensitivities or digestive discomfort that Alpo’s ingredient list could actually worsen. I’d recommend trying higher-quality options first, as many dogs become less picky when their digestive health improves with better nutrition.
9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food.
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
2,847+ dog owners already did
