9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
Shelter manager, certified canine nutritionist, and lifelong dog lover
Exceptional protein content: Orijen delivers 38-43% protein from 85% animal ingredients, significantly higher than most premium competitors like Wellness CORE (34%) or Taste of the Wild (32%).
Premium pricing with calorie efficiency: At $4+ per pound, it costs nearly double mid-tier brands, but higher calorie density means feeding smaller portions that partially offset the expense.
Best suited for active dogs: Working breeds and high-energy dogs thrive on the rich formulation, while sedentary, senior, or dogs with health conditions may experience weight gain or digestive issues.
Quality concerns post-2022: Despite zero recalls, increasing customer reports of palatability issues and formula changes suggest potential quality control challenges under new Mars ownership.
Sister brand Acana offers 80% of benefits at 60% of cost: Made by the same company with similar philosophy but lower protein density, making it a smarter value choice for most dog owners.
Orijen launched in 2005 under Champion Petfoods, a family-owned Canadian company that had been making pet food since 1985. The brand was built around a single idea: dogs and cats are carnivores, and their food should reflect that biology. That’s where the term “Biologically Appropriate” comes from—it’s Orijen’s way of saying the food mimics what a dog’s ancestors would have hunted and eaten.
In 2023, Champion Petfoods was acquired by Mars Inc., one of the largest pet food conglomerates in the world. That shift raised eyebrows among some long-time customers who valued the brand’s independent roots, but Mars has publicly committed to maintaining Orijen’s quality standards and production methods. As of 2025, the brand continues to manufacture in two facilities: NorthStar Kitchen in Alberta, Canada and DogStar Kitchen in Auburn, Kentucky. The Kentucky facility handles most of the U.S. market and emphasizes regional sourcing—meats and eggs from American farms, fish from the Atlantic and East Coast.
Orijen’s core values center on fresh and raw ingredients, minimal processing, and transparency. The brand lists every ingredient with its origin and purpose, and it’s one of the few that includes organs, cartilage, and bone in its recipes—what it calls the WholePrey ratio. This approach is designed to deliver nutrition without relying heavily on synthetic vitamins and minerals, though some fortification still happens to meet AAFCO standards.
The brand’s reputation in the premium dog food market is strong. It consistently ranks at the top of independent reviews for ingredient quality and protein content, and it has a clean recall history—no major incidents in over a decade. Veterinarians often recommend it for dogs with specific dietary needs, though some caution that the high protein and fat levels aren’t appropriate for every dog. Among pet owners, Orijen inspires loyalty: many swear by visible improvements in coat, energy, and digestion. But the premium price—often double or triple that of mid-tier brands—means it’s out of reach for budget-conscious buyers, and some dogs don’t tolerate the richness well during transition.
Orijen positions itself as the gold standard for owners who want maximum meat content and minimal compromise. Whether that philosophy translates to measurably better health for your dog is something we’ll explore throughout this review.
Orijen doesn’t mess around when it comes to protein. Open a bag of Orijen Original, and the first five ingredients are free-run chicken, free-run turkey, flounder, whole mackerel, and chicken liver. These aren’t meals or by-products—they’re fresh or raw whole meats, meaning they’re refrigerated or frozen at peak freshness without rendering or heavy processing. That distinction matters because fresh meats retain more of their natural moisture, vitamins, and amino acids compared to rendered meals, though they also shrink significantly during cooking, which is why you’ll see meat meals listed further down the ingredient panel to maintain protein density after processing.
Across the product line, Orijen emphasizes multiple animal protein sources in each formula. Regional Red features beef, wild boar, bison, lamb, and goat. Six Fish includes flounder, mackerel, hake, redfish, herring, and salmon. This variety isn’t just for show—it’s meant to provide a broader spectrum of amino acids, fatty acids, and micronutrients. The downside? If your dog has a confirmed protein allergy, Orijen’s multi-protein approach makes it harder to isolate the culprit. Single-protein formulas aren’t really part of the brand’s DNA.
For years, Orijen was synonymous with grain-free. The traditional line uses legumes like peas, lentils, and chickpeas as carbohydrate sources, along with potatoes and sweet potatoes. These ingredients provide fiber, some vitamins, and binding for the kibble, but they’ve also been at the center of the DCM (dilated cardiomyopathy) controversy—the FDA investigation into potential links between grain-free, legume-heavy diets and heart disease in dogs. While no definitive causal link has been proven, the concern was enough to prompt Orijen to launch the Amazing Grains line in 2023.
Amazing Grains incorporates oats, quinoa, and chia seeds alongside the brand’s signature high meat content. The idea is to give owners a grain-inclusive option without sacrificing protein levels. The grains used are marketed as “ancient” and digestible, with added prebiotics like inulin to support gut health. Customer response has been mixed—some appreciate having a grain option, especially for dogs with suspected legume sensitivities, while others see it as a departure from the brand’s original philosophy. Nutritionally, the Amazing Grains line still clocks in at 38–40% protein, so it’s not a major step down from the grain-free formulas.
Orijen’s fat content typically sits around 15–20%, sourced primarily from the animal proteins themselves—chicken fat, fish oils, and whole eggs. The brand highlights its use of DHA and EPA from herring and mackerel, which are recognized for supporting skin, coat, and cognitive function. These omega-3 fatty acids are especially important for puppies and senior dogs, and Orijen’s inclusion of whole fish (not just fish oil) means you’re getting a more complete nutrient profile, including naturally occurring vitamins A and D.
The fat levels are on the higher end compared to mainstream brands, which is great for active dogs but can be too rich for less active or senior dogs prone to weight gain. If your dog has a history of pancreatitis or fat sensitivity, Orijen’s richness might be a concern—something to discuss with your vet before switching.
This is where Orijen sets itself apart. The brand doesn’t just use muscle meat—it includes organs like liver, kidney, and tripe, plus cartilage and bone. The WholePrey ratio is meant to mimic the nutrient profile of a whole prey animal, delivering naturally occurring vitamins, minerals, glucosamine, and chondroitin without relying heavily on synthetic supplements. Liver, for example, is one of the most nutrient-dense foods on the planet, packed with vitamin A, B vitamins, iron, and copper.
The inclusion of cartilage and bone provides natural sources of calcium, phosphorus, and joint-supporting compounds. While the amounts aren’t at therapeutic levels for dogs with severe arthritis, they’re a meaningful addition for general joint health. This approach is less common in mainstream dog foods, which typically rely on isolated supplements like glucosamine hydrochloride or chondroitin sulfate added at the end of processing.
Orijen includes a rotating cast of fruits and vegetables—pumpkin, butternut squash, collard greens, apples, pears, cranberries—that provide fiber, antioxidants, and phytonutrients. These aren’t filler; they’re included in modest amounts to support digestion and immune function. The brand also adds botanicals like turmeric, rosehips, and chicory root. Turmeric is a natural anti-inflammatory, rosehips are rich in vitamin C, and chicory root provides inulin, a prebiotic fiber that feeds beneficial gut bacteria.
The inclusion of these ingredients is well-intentioned, but it’s worth noting that the amounts are relatively small. Don’t expect turmeric in dog food to replace a targeted joint supplement if your dog has significant mobility issues. These ingredients are more about holistic support than targeted therapy.
Orijen adds probiotics like Bacillus coagulans to support gut health. Probiotics are live microorganisms that can help balance the gut microbiome, improve digestion, and support immune function. The challenge with probiotics in kibble is that the high-heat processing required to make kibble can kill many of these beneficial bacteria, so the effectiveness depends on how they’re added—ideally after cooking, as a coating. Orijen uses a freeze-dried raw coating on its kibble, which helps preserve the viability of probiotics and enhances palatability. It’s a smart move, though the probiotic strains and CFU (colony-forming units) counts aren’t disclosed on the packaging, which makes it hard to assess therapeutic potency.
Orijen markets itself on what it doesn’t include: no meat meals as primary proteins, no by-products, no corn, wheat, or soy, no artificial preservatives, colors, or flavors. Instead, it uses mixed tocopherols (vitamin E) as a natural preservative. This clean-label approach appeals to health-conscious owners, though it’s worth noting that not all meat meals are low-quality—meals from named sources like “chicken meal” or “salmon meal” can be highly digestible and protein-dense. Orijen’s preference for fresh and raw meats is a philosophical choice as much as a nutritional one.
| Price per pound | $4.20+ |
| Primary protein | Fresh chicken, turkey, fish (flounder, mackerel, herring), beef, wild boar |
| By-products | None (uses organs, cartilage, and bone as whole prey) |
| AAFCO compliance | Yes, all life stages + feeding trials on select products |
| Formula options | Original, Regional Red, Six Fish, Fit & Trim, Puppy, Senior, Amazing Grains line, Small Breed |
| Availability | Specialty pet stores, farm stores, and online retailers |
Let’s talk numbers. Orijen Original lists a guaranteed analysis of at least 38% crude protein and 18% crude fat, with a maximum of 4% crude fiber and 12% moisture. On a dry matter basis—which removes moisture to allow fair comparisons across wet and dry foods—that translates to roughly 43% protein and 20% fat. Those are exceptional figures. For context, most mainstream kibbles sit around 25–30% protein and 12–16% fat on a dry matter basis. Even premium brands like Blue Buffalo Wilderness hover around 34% protein.
The Fit & Trim formula pushes protein even higher—47.7% on a dry matter basis—while dropping fat to 14.7%. This makes it one of the highest-protein, lowest-fat kibbles available, which is ideal for dogs who need to lose weight without losing muscle mass. The trade-off is that some dogs find it less palatable than the fattier formulas, and the lower fat content means fewer calories per cup, so portion sizes may need to be larger than expected.
All Orijen formulas meet AAFCO nutritional profiles for all life stages, meaning they’re formulated to support puppies, adults, and seniors. The brand also conducts AAFCO feeding trials on select products, which is a more rigorous standard than simply meeting nutrient profiles on paper. Feeding trials involve actually feeding the food to dogs over a minimum of six months and monitoring health markers like blood work, body condition, and stool quality. Orijen’s 2020 feeding trial with Labrador Retrievers—funded by Champion Petfoods—showed that the grain-free diet maintained healthy taurine levels and overall health, which was important given the DCM concerns swirling around grain-free diets at the time.
That said, “all life stages” doesn’t mean every formula is ideal for every dog at every stage. The high protein and fat levels in Orijen Original are great for active adult dogs and puppies, but they might be overkill for a sedentary senior. The brand does offer life stage-specific formulas—Puppy, Puppy Large Breed, and Senior—that adjust calcium, phosphorus, and calorie density to better match specific needs. Puppy Large Breed, for example, has controlled calcium and phosphorus to prevent developmental orthopedic issues in large breed puppies, whose rapid growth makes them vulnerable to joint problems if fed too much of these minerals.
Orijen is calorie-dense, which means you feed less compared to lower-quality kibbles. Orijen Original contains roughly 3,940 kcal/kg (or about 449 kcal per cup). For a 50-pound active dog, you’re looking at around 2 to 2.5 cups per day, compared to 3 to 4 cups of a mid-tier brand. This matters for two reasons: one, a bag lasts longer, which offsets some of the sticker shock; two, smaller portions mean less waste and firmer stools, which most owners appreciate.
The flip side is that it’s easy to overfeed if you’re eyeballing portions or transitioning from a less dense food. A dog used to 3 cups of a mainstream kibble might gain weight quickly if you feed the same volume of Orijen. Following the feeding guidelines on the bag and monitoring body condition is important, especially in the first few weeks.
Orijen’s inclusion of bone and cartilage in the WholePrey ratio provides naturally occurring calcium and phosphorus, which are critical for bone health, especially in growing puppies. The calcium-to-phosphorus ratio in Orijen formulas is typically around 1.2:1 to 1.5:1, which is within the recommended range for dogs. However, the absolute levels of calcium can be on the higher side—Puppy Large Breed formulas are calibrated to avoid this, but if you’re feeding Orijen Original to a large breed puppy, you might be giving more calcium and phosphorus than ideal for skeletal development. Large breed puppies are particularly sensitive to excess calcium, which can lead to joint issues down the line.
For joint support, Orijen includes naturally occurring glucosamine and chondroitin from cartilage and bone. The brand doesn’t disclose exact amounts, which makes it hard to assess whether they’re at therapeutic levels. For a dog with mild joint stiffness, the amounts might provide some support. For a dog with moderate to severe arthritis, you’d likely still need a dedicated joint supplement with higher, standardized doses of glucosamine (typically 1,000–1,500 mg per day for a 50-pound dog) and chondroitin.
Despite Orijen’s emphasis on whole-food nutrition, the brand still adds synthetic vitamins and minerals to ensure nutritional completeness. You’ll see ingredients like zinc proteinate, vitamin E supplement, and thiamine mononitrate on the label. This isn’t a compromise—it’s necessary to meet AAFCO standards and account for nutrient losses during cooking. The difference is that Orijen starts with a nutrient-rich base (organs, whole meats, vegetables), so the amount of synthetic fortification needed is less than in a grain-based kibble that relies on corn and by-products.
The brand has also increased B vitamins and antioxidants in recent formulations, which supports energy metabolism and immune function. Vitamin E, for example, is a fat-soluble antioxidant that protects cells from oxidative damage, and it’s especially important in high-fat diets like Orijen’s.
Active adult dogs are Orijen’s sweet spot. If your dog runs, hikes, or works regularly, the high protein and fat content will fuel that activity and support muscle maintenance. Breeds like Border Collies, Australian Shepherds, and Labrador Retrievers—dogs bred for stamina and work—tend to thrive on Orijen’s nutrient density. The calorie density also means you’re not feeding massive portions to keep up with their energy needs.
Puppies, especially those of medium to large breeds, benefit from Orijen’s protein and fat levels during their rapid growth phase. The Puppy and Puppy Large Breed formulas are specifically calibrated for this, with controlled calcium and phosphorus to support healthy skeletal development without overdoing it. The inclusion of DHA from fish supports brain and eye development, which is especially important in the first year.
Dogs with food sensitivities often do well on Orijen, particularly if they’ve struggled with grains or low-quality proteins. The Six Fish formula is a go-to for dogs with poultry sensitivities, and the limited use of fillers and artificial additives reduces the risk of triggering intolerances. That said, the multi-protein approach means Orijen isn’t ideal for dogs with multiple confirmed allergies—you’d need a true limited-ingredient diet for that.
Picky eaters frequently convert on Orijen. The freeze-dried raw coating and high meat content make it more aromatic and palatable than standard kibble. If your dog turns their nose up at most foods, Orijen is worth a shot—though at this price point, it’s a painful gamble if they refuse it.
Dogs with pancreatitis or fat sensitivity should steer clear. Orijen’s fat content—typically 18–20%—is too rich for dogs with compromised pancreatic function. Even the Fit & Trim formula, at 14.7% fat on a dry matter basis, is higher than the 10–12% often recommended for pancreatitis management. If your dog has a history of pancreatitis, you’ll want a prescription low-fat diet, not Orijen.
Senior dogs with low activity levels might gain weight on Orijen unless you’re vigilant about portion control. The calorie density and fat content are designed for active metabolism, not couch potatoes. The Senior formula does reduce calories and fat slightly, but it’s still richer than many senior-specific diets. If your older dog is already overweight or has joint issues that limit movement, a lower-calorie, moderate-protein food might be a better fit.
Dogs with kidney disease need to limit protein intake, especially in advanced stages. Orijen’s 38–43% protein is the opposite of what a renal diet requires. If your dog has been diagnosed with kidney disease, your vet will likely recommend a prescription diet with restricted protein and phosphorus—Orijen isn’t an option here.
Dogs with multiple protein allergies will struggle with Orijen’s multi-protein formulas. If your dog is allergic to chicken and fish, for example, Orijen Original is off the table. The brand doesn’t offer single-protein, limited-ingredient diets, so dogs with complex allergies are better served by brands like Natural Balance L.I.D. or Canidae PURE.
Budget-conscious owners need to be realistic. At $4+ per pound, feeding Orijen to a 70-pound dog can run $150–$200 per month. If that’s a stretch, there are solid mid-tier options like Taste of the Wild or Wellness CORE that offer good nutrition at half the price. Orijen is a premium product with premium costs, and while the quality is there, it’s not the only path to a healthy dog.
Large breed puppies should only be fed the Puppy Large Breed formula, not Orijen Original or other adult formulas. The calcium and phosphorus levels in adult formulas can be too high for large breed puppies, increasing the risk of developmental orthopedic diseases like hip dysplasia or osteochondrosis. The Puppy Large Breed formula is specifically designed to provide adequate nutrition without overshooting these minerals.
Dogs transitioning from low-quality food may experience digestive upset when switching to Orijen. The richness and high protein content can overwhelm a gut that’s used to corn- and by-product-based kibble. A slow transition—mixing increasing amounts of Orijen with the old food over 7–10 days—is essential. Some dogs may also experience softer stools or increased gas initially as their digestive system adapts to the higher fat and protein content.
Small breed dogs can benefit from the Small Breed formula, which uses smaller kibble sizes for easier chewing and digestion. The calorie density also works in their favor, as small dogs have faster metabolisms and higher energy needs per pound of body weight compared to large breeds.
Palatability is where Orijen consistently scores high marks. The freeze-dried raw coating is a game-changer—it smells like real meat, not the generic “kibble” smell that characterizes most dry foods. Open a bag of Orijen Original, and you’ll notice the difference immediately. Dogs notice it too. In user reviews, roughly 66% of owners report their dogs “love it” or transitioned enthusiastically, even if they were previously picky.
The Six Fish formula tends to be especially popular with picky eaters, likely because fish is highly aromatic and dogs are naturally drawn to it. Regional Red, with its red meat focus, also gets strong marks for acceptance. The Amazing Grains line has received mixed feedback—some dogs take to it immediately, while others seem less enthusiastic compared to the grain-free formulas. It’s unclear whether that’s due to the inclusion of grains or just individual preference, but it’s worth noting if you’re considering the switch.
That said, not every dog loves Orijen. About 5–9% of reviews mention refusal, and this rate spiked slightly after 2022, when some customers reported formula changes. Dogs who loved Orijen for years suddenly refused to eat it, or showed less enthusiasm. Champion Petfoods has stated that changes have been minimal—mostly related to ingredient sourcing and minor nutritional tweaks—but the anecdotal evidence from customers suggests something shifted. Whether it’s a subtle change in taste, texture, or smell, a small but vocal group of long-time users have switched brands.
For dogs who do accept it, the feeding experience is smooth. The calorie density means smaller portions, which makes mealtime less of a production. The kibble size is manageable for most dogs, though large breeds might inhale it without much chewing—something to watch if your dog is a gulper. The Small Breed formula addresses this with smaller kibble, which is appreciated by owners of toy and small breeds.
Let’s be blunt: Orijen is expensive. At $4.20 per pound on average, it’s nearly double the cost of Taste of the Wild ($2.14/lb) and about 40% more than Acana ($3.60/lb), its sister brand under Champion Petfoods. For a 50-pound active dog, you’re looking at roughly $80–$100 per month for Orijen Original, compared to $40–$50 for a mid-tier brand like Wellness CORE.
The question is whether the premium is justified. From a nutritional standpoint, yes—Orijen delivers 38–43% protein from fresh and raw animal sources, with 85% of ingredients derived from animals. That’s unmatched in the mainstream premium market. Farmina N&D comes close with 37% protein and 98% animal-sourced protein, but it’s still slightly less protein-dense and uses more rendered meals. If maximum protein and fresh ingredients are your priority, Orijen is at the top.
From a practical standpoint, the value proposition gets murkier. The calorie density means you feed less, so a 25-pound bag of Orijen lasts longer than the same weight of a less dense food. This partially offsets the higher per-pound cost. Many owners also report smaller, firmer stools with Orijen, which is a quality-of-life benefit—less waste to pick up, and a sign of better digestibility. Over time, some owners also report fewer vet visits for issues like skin allergies, ear infections, and digestive upset, which could save money in the long run. But those benefits are hard to quantify and vary by dog.
The zero-recall history is another intangible value. Peace of mind has worth, especially if you’ve dealt with recalls or contamination scares in the past. Orijen’s rigorous quality control and traceability systems reduce risk, which matters when you’re feeding your dog the same food every day for years.
If you’re budget-conscious, there are smart compromises. Acana Heritage, also made by Champion Petfoods, offers a similar philosophy—high protein, fresh ingredients, WholePrey ratios—at about $3.60 per pound. The protein content is lower (29% vs. 38%), and the animal ingredient percentage is 60–65% instead of 85%, but it’s still a significant step up from mainstream brands and more affordable than Orijen. Another option is to feed Orijen as a rotational diet—mixing it with a less expensive kibble to stretch the bag while still delivering some of the benefits.
For owners who can afford it and prioritize ingredient quality above all else, Orijen delivers. For those balancing nutrition and budget, alternatives like Acana, Farmina, or even Kirkland Signature (Costco’s premium line) offer 70–80% of the nutritional value at 50–60% of the cost. Not sure whether to choose a value brand or stick with premium? Read our other review on Member’s Mark dog food for a detailed comparison of how budget options stack up.
Orijen manufactures in two facilities: NorthStar Kitchen in Alberta, Canada, and DogStar Kitchen in Auburn, Kentucky. The Kentucky facility, which opened in 2016, handles most of the U.S. market and spans 85 acres with a 371,000-square-foot production space. It’s designed to Champion Petfoods’ specifications and emphasizes regional ingredient sourcing—meats from American farms, fish from the Atlantic and East Coast.
The facilities are certified under Safe Quality Food (SQF), a Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) standard, and maintain HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) protocols. These aren’t just buzzwords—they’re rigorous systems that require monitoring critical points in production where contamination or safety issues could occur, with documented corrective actions. Champion also holds Safe Feed/Safe Food (SFSF) certification, which is specific to pet food safety.
Canned foods, which Orijen doesn’t produce in-house, are made by industry partners that are audited to British Retail Consortium (BRC) standards, another GFSI-recognized certification. Champion conducts regular quality audits of these partners, though the specifics of those audits aren’t publicly detailed.
Ingredient traceability is a strong point. Champion uses a track-and-trace system that links every batch of ingredients to the final product lot code. If there’s ever an issue, they can trace back to the specific supplier and production date. This level of traceability is above average in the pet food industry, where many brands rely on third-party manufacturers and have less visibility into the supply chain.
Testing happens at multiple stages: raw ingredients are tested on arrival, in-process samples are checked during production, and finished goods are tested for pathogens like Salmonella and Listeria before shipping. No lot is released until it passes food safety testing. Champion also monitors for heavy metals, mycotoxins, and pesticides, though the results of these tests aren’t published in a consumer-facing format like some ultra-transparent brands do.
The zero-recall record over the past decade is notable. Recalls are common in the pet food industry—even premium brands have had Salmonella or vitamin D toxicity issues in recent years—but Orijen has avoided them. This suggests that the quality control systems are working as intended, though it’s worth noting that the absence of recalls doesn’t mean the absence of risk. It means issues are being caught and corrected before products reach consumers, which is exactly what quality control is supposed to do.
One area where Orijen could improve is transparency around supplier details. The brand describes ingredients as “regionally sourced” and provides general information—U.S. farms for meats, East Coast fisheries for fish—but doesn’t name specific suppliers or provide farm-level traceability. For a brand positioning itself at the top of the premium market, that level of granular transparency would set it apart from competitors.
Champion Petfoods published a 2022 Impact Report that outlines its commitment to sustainability, but the details are more aspirational than concrete. The brand emphasizes “fresh regional ingredients” and “partnerships for sustainable sourcing,” but specific metrics—water usage, carbon footprint, waste reduction targets—aren’t published. This is a gap compared to brands like Open Farm, which provides detailed sustainability data and third-party certifications for humane sourcing.
On the ingredient side, Orijen sources free-run chicken and turkey, which suggests cage-free environments, though the brand doesn’t specify certifications like Certified Humane or Global Animal Partnership. Fish are described as “wild-caught” or “sustainably sourced,” but there’s no mention of Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification, which is the gold standard for sustainable fisheries. Without third-party verification, it’s hard to assess how much of this is marketing versus measurable practice.
Packaging is a mixed bag. Orijen uses multi-layer plastic bags for dry food, which are durable and protect the product but aren’t widely recyclable. The brand hasn’t announced plans to transition to more sustainable packaging materials, which is increasingly expected in the premium segment. Wet food comes in cans and pouches, which are more recyclable, but the environmental footprint of canned food production is higher due to energy-intensive manufacturing.
On the ethics side, Orijen’s acquisition by Mars Inc. in 2023 raised questions. Mars is a massive corporation with a mixed record on sustainability and labor practices, and some long-time Orijen customers worry that profit motives will eventually compromise quality. Mars has publicly committed to maintaining Orijen’s standards, and as of 2025, there’s no evidence of formula downgrades or cost-cutting. But the skepticism isn’t entirely unfounded—corporate acquisitions often lead to gradual changes that prioritize margins over mission.
Champion Petfoods does engage in animal testing, but it’s limited to palatability trials, stool analysis, and AAFCO feeding trials. The company states, “If it’s not OK for our dogs and cats, then it’s not OK for any other dogs and cats,” which suggests a humane approach, but the details of these trials—how many animals are involved, what conditions they’re kept in—aren’t publicly disclosed. For owners who prioritize cruelty-free products, this lack of transparency is a concern.
Overall, Orijen’s sustainability and ethics efforts are above average for the industry but below what you’d expect from a brand charging $4+ per pound. There’s room for improvement in transparency, third-party certifications, and measurable environmental impact data.
I work at a dog shelter, and we tested Orijen Original with one of our longer-term residents—a four-year-old mixed breed named Hazel. She’s about 45 pounds, lean and athletic, with a coat that’s part Lab, part something wiry and scruffy. Hazel came to us with a history of digestive issues and what the previous owner described as “constant itching,” though no specific allergies had been diagnosed. She’d been on a mid-tier grain-free kibble at the shelter, which she ate without enthusiasm and produced inconsistent stools—sometimes firm, sometimes loose, always unpredictable.
We transitioned Hazel to Orijen over about ten days, mixing increasing amounts with her old food. The first thing I noticed was her immediate interest in the bowl. Hazel is not a picky eater, but she’s also not a dog who gets excited about meals. With Orijen, she started showing up at feeding time with more energy, tail wagging, eyes locked on the bowl. The freeze-dried coating seemed to make a real difference in palatability—she’d sniff the food, then dive in without hesitation.
By the end of the second week, her stools had firmed up and become more predictable. We were picking up smaller, more consistent waste, which is always a win in a shelter environment. The itching, which had been persistent enough that she’d scratched raw patches on her flanks, started to subside. By week three, the scratching was noticeably less frequent, and the patches were healing. We didn’t change anything else—same environment, same routine—so the food seemed to be the variable.
Hazel’s coat also started to look better. It wasn’t a dramatic transformation, but the dullness that had been there when she arrived was replaced by a bit more shine, and the wiry texture seemed less brittle. She didn’t suddenly become a show dog, but she looked healthier, which mattered.
The only downside was that Hazel seemed hungrier than usual in the first week or two. Orijen’s calorie density means smaller portions, and she wasn’t used to that. We adjusted by splitting her daily ration into three smaller meals instead of two, which seemed to help. By week three, she’d adapted and wasn’t begging between meals anymore.
Overall, Hazel did well on Orijen. The digestive and skin improvements were noticeable, and her energy level stayed consistent—she’s always been an active dog, so we didn’t see a dramatic uptick, but she didn’t slow down either. For a dog with her history, Orijen seemed to address the issues without introducing new ones.
Orijen’s customer reviews are overwhelmingly positive, but they’re not without nuance. Across platforms like Chewy, Amazon, and DogFoodAdvisor, the brand averages 4.5 to 4.7 out of 5 stars, with the majority of reviews in the 4- and 5-star range. The most common praise centers on coat quality, energy, and digestion. Owners report shinier coats, firmer stools, and more vitality, often within the first few weeks of switching.
One recurring theme is success with picky eaters. Owners of dogs who refused other brands or picked at their food report that Orijen changed the game. A typical review: “My Husky is picky and refuses most foods. She loves Orijen—eats every bite.” The freeze-dried coating and high meat content seem to win over even the most discerning dogs.
Another common benefit is allergy relief. Owners of dogs with chronic itching, ear infections, or hot spots report noticeable improvements after switching to Orijen, particularly the Six Fish formula. One review mentioned, “After years of trying different foods, Orijen Six Fish finally stopped the constant scratching. His ears cleared up, and his coat looks amazing.” These anecdotal reports align with what you’d expect from a high-quality, limited-additive food—fewer potential triggers, better nutrient absorption.
On the negative side, about 5–9% of reviews mention refusal or palatability issues, and this rate increased slightly after 2022. Some long-time customers report that their dogs, who had eaten Orijen for years, suddenly refused the food or showed less enthusiasm. A representative comment: “My dogs loved Orijen for five years, then something changed. They won’t eat the new bags.” Champion Petfoods has stated that formula changes have been minimal, but the pattern is consistent enough to suggest something shifted—whether it’s a subtle change in sourcing, processing, or even just batch-to-batch variation.
Digestive upset is another recurring complaint, affecting about 6% of reviews. Diarrhea, loose stools, and vomiting are most common in dogs transitioning too quickly or in dogs with pre-existing sensitivities. The Fit & Trim formula seems to generate more digestive complaints than other lines, possibly due to its lower fat content and higher fiber. A slower transition—10 days or more—seems to reduce these issues, but some dogs simply don’t tolerate the richness.
There are also scattered reports of quality control issues—bags with strange odors, mold, or inconsistent kibble appearance. These represent less than 3% of reviews, but they’re worth noting. Most are resolved with retailer refunds or replacements, and Champion Petfoods appears responsive when contacted directly. Still, for a brand charging premium prices, even a small number of quality issues is concerning.
A handful of reviews mention serious health concerns—pancreatitis, kidney issues, or bladder stones—that owners attribute to Orijen. These are rare (less than 1% of reviews), and it’s impossible to establish causation from anecdotal reports. Dogs develop these conditions for many reasons, and it’s unlikely that Orijen is the sole cause. That said, the high protein and fat content could exacerbate pre-existing conditions, which is why veterinary consultation is important before switching to such a rich food.
One interesting data point: long-term users—those who’ve fed Orijen for 5+ years—are among the most loyal. They consistently report stable health, no major issues, and visible benefits that justify the cost. But this cohort is also the most vocal when they perceive a decline in quality, which is where the post-2022 complaints cluster. It’s a reminder that brand loyalty in the premium pet food market is hard-won and easily lost.
Orijen occupies the ultra-premium segment, competing with brands like Acana, Farmina N&D, Fromm, and Taste of the Wild. Each has strengths and trade-offs, and the right choice depends on your priorities—cost, protein levels, ingredient sourcing, or specialty formulas.
Acana Heritage is Orijen’s sister brand, also made by Champion Petfoods. It follows the same Biologically Appropriate philosophy but with 29% protein (vs. 38% in Orijen) and 60–65% animal ingredients (vs. 85%). The ingredient quality is comparable—fresh meats, WholePrey ratios, regional sourcing—but the protein density is lower. The trade-off is cost: Acana averages $3.60 per pound, making it about 15% cheaper than Orijen. For most dogs, Acana delivers 80–90% of Orijen’s benefits at a more accessible price. If you’re on a budget but want the Champion Petfoods quality, Acana is the smarter pick.
Farmina N&D is an Italian brand that rivals Orijen in protein content—37% protein with 98% of that protein sourced from animals. It uses a mix of fresh meats and meals, which some see as a downside compared to Orijen’s fresh-first approach, but meals are highly digestible and protein-dense. Farmina also offers a wider range of limited-ingredient and single-protein formulas, which is a plus for dogs with allergies. Pricing sits around $3.40 per pound, making it slightly cheaper than Orijen. If you want comparable nutrition with more formula options, Farmina is worth considering. For a deeper dive into a more budget-friendly fresh food option, check out our review on The Farmer’s Dog, which offers personalized, human-grade meals delivered to your door.
Taste of the Wild is a popular mid-tier option at $2.14 per pound—nearly half the cost of Orijen. It offers 32% protein and grain-free formulas with novel proteins like bison and venison. The ingredient quality is a step down—Taste of the Wild relies more on meals and legumes—but it’s AAFCO-compliant and has only had one recall in its history. For budget-conscious owners, it’s a solid compromise. You’re not getting Orijen’s fresh ingredients or protein density, but you’re also not spending $100+ per month.
Wellness CORE is another mid-tier competitor at $2.69 per pound with 34% protein. It uses a mix of meals and whole meats, with a grain-free focus. Wellness has a strong reputation for quality and transparency, though it doesn’t match Orijen’s ingredient freshness or animal ingredient percentage. It’s a good middle ground for owners who want premium nutrition without the ultra-premium price.
Fromm is a family-owned brand that emphasizes variety and quality at $2.80–$3.20 per pound. It offers both grain-free and grain-inclusive formulas with moderate protein levels (26–30%). Fromm’s strength is its rotational feeding philosophy—the brand encourages switching between formulas to provide dietary variety. It’s less protein-dense than Orijen but appeals to owners who prioritize ingredient diversity and a family-owned ethos.
Where Orijen stands out is protein density and fresh ingredients. No mainstream brand matches its 85% animal ingredient content or fresh-first approach. The zero-recall history is also a differentiator. But the premium price is a barrier, and brands like Acana and Farmina offer 80–90% of the nutritional value at 20–30% lower cost. If maximum protein and fresh ingredients are non-negotiable, Orijen wins. If you’re looking for the best value in the premium segment, Acana or Farmina are smarter picks.
Orijen is built for active, healthy dogs who can metabolize high protein and fat efficiently. If your dog runs, works, or plays hard every day, Orijen’s nutrient density will support that lifestyle. Breeds like Border Collies, Australian Shepherds, Labrador Retrievers, and German Shepherds—dogs with high energy and athletic builds—are ideal candidates. The 38–43% protein content supports lean muscle mass, and the calorie density means you’re not feeding huge portions to keep up with their needs.
Puppies, especially medium to large breeds, benefit from Orijen’s protein and fat during their rapid growth phase. The Puppy and Puppy Large Breed formulas are specifically designed for this, with controlled calcium and phosphorus to prevent developmental orthopedic issues. The inclusion of DHA from fish supports brain and eye development, which is critical in the first year. Just make sure you’re feeding the right formula—large breed puppies should only get Puppy Large Breed, not the adult formulas, to avoid excess calcium.
Dogs with food sensitivities or allergies often respond well to Orijen, particularly if they’ve struggled with grains or low-quality proteins. The Six Fish formula is a strong choice for dogs with poultry sensitivities, and the limited use of fillers and artificial additives reduces the risk of intolerances. That said, the multi-protein approach means Orijen isn’t ideal for dogs with multiple confirmed allergies—you’d need a true limited-ingredient diet for that.
Picky eaters frequently convert on Orijen. The freeze-dried raw coating and high meat content make it more aromatic and palatable than standard kibble. If your dog has turned their nose up at every other food, Orijen is worth trying—just be prepared for the cost if it becomes their new favorite.
Orijen is not suitable for dogs with pancreatitis, kidney disease, or fat sensitivity. The 18–20% fat content is too rich for compromised pancreatic function, and the 38–43% protein is the opposite of what a renal diet requires. If your dog has been diagnosed with either condition, you’ll need a prescription diet, not Orijen.
Senior dogs with low activity levels might gain weight on Orijen unless you’re careful with portions. The calorie density and fat content are designed for active metabolism, not sedentary lifestyles. The Senior formula reduces calories and fat slightly, but it’s still richer than many senior-specific diets. If your older dog is already overweight or has mobility issues, a lower-calorie, moderate-protein food might be a better fit.
Small breed dogs do well on the Small Breed formula, which uses smaller kibble for easier chewing and digestion. The calorie density works in their favor, as small dogs have faster metabolisms and higher energy needs per pound of body weight. Just watch portions—it’s easy to overfeed when you’re measuring by eye.
As a dog food specialist, I think Orijen is excellent for the right dog, but it’s not a universal solution. The ingredient quality is top-tier—85% animal ingredients, fresh and raw meats, WholePrey ratios, and a clean recall history. The protein content is unmatched in the mainstream premium market, and the nutritional density means you’re feeding less while delivering more. For active, healthy dogs, Orijen is one of the best options available. I’d recommend it without hesitation for a Border Collie who runs agility, a working German Shepherd, or a high-energy Labrador.
But for sedentary dogs, seniors, or dogs with health issues, Orijen is overkill. The richness can lead to weight gain, digestive upset, or exacerbate conditions like pancreatitis or kidney disease. The high protein and fat levels are designed for dogs with active metabolisms, not couch potatoes. If your dog falls into that category, you’d be better served by a moderate-protein, lower-fat food tailored to their needs.
The cost is a real barrier. At $4+ per pound, Orijen is nearly double the price of solid mid-tier brands like Wellness CORE or Taste of the Wild, and about 40% more than Acana, which is made by the same company and shares much of the same philosophy. If you can afford it and your dog thrives on it, the investment is worth it. But if you’re stretching your budget to afford Orijen, I’d suggest trying Acana first. You’ll get 80–90% of the nutritional value at a more manageable price, and you can always upgrade to Orijen later if you feel your dog needs the extra protein density.
The formula change concerns are something to watch. While Champion Petfoods insists changes have been minimal, enough customers have reported palatability issues or digestive upset post-2022 that it’s worth noting. If you’ve been feeding Orijen for years and suddenly your dog refuses it, you’re not alone. Whether this is due to actual formula changes, batch variability, or something else is unclear, but it’s a trend that could signal quality control challenges as the brand scales under Mars ownership.
Would I buy this for my dog? If I had an active, healthy adult dog with no special dietary needs, yes. The ingredient quality and nutritional density are hard to beat, and the zero-recall history gives me confidence in the brand’s safety standards. But if I had a senior dog, a dog with a history of pancreatitis, or a tight budget, I’d look elsewhere. Orijen is a premium product that delivers premium results, but it’s not the only path to a healthy dog, and it’s not the right fit for every situation.
Would I recommend it to a friend? With caveats. I’d ask about their dog’s age, activity level, health history, and budget first. If they have an active dog and can afford it, I’d say go for it. If they’re on a budget or their dog has health issues, I’d steer them toward Acana, Farmina, or a prescription diet, depending on the specifics. Orijen is a great food, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution, and I think it’s important to be honest about that.
It depends on your dog’s needs and your budget. Orijen delivers exceptional ingredient quality with 85% animal ingredients and 38-43% protein from fresh meats. The calorie density means you feed smaller portions, which partially offsets the cost. For active, healthy dogs, the premium can be justified by the nutritional value and zero-recall history. However, if you’re budget-conscious, Acana (Orijen’s sister brand) offers similar philosophy and quality at about $3.60/lb versus Orijen’s $4.20/lb, delivering roughly 80-90% of the benefits at a more accessible price point.
Yes, but choose the right formula. Puppy and Puppy Large Breed formulas are specifically designed for growing dogs, with controlled calcium and phosphorus levels. Large breed puppies should only get the Large Breed formula—never the adult formulas—as excess calcium can cause developmental orthopedic issues like hip dysplasia. The high protein and DHA from fish support healthy growth and brain development during the critical first year.
Digestive upset affects about 6% of dogs switching to Orijen, usually due to the richness and high protein content. This is most common when transitioning too quickly from a lower-quality food. Do a slow 10-day transition, mixing increasing amounts of Orijen with the old food. The Fit & Trim formula seems to cause more digestive issues than other lines. If loose stools persist beyond the transition period, the food may simply be too rich for your dog.
Orijen can help dogs with certain sensitivities, particularly grain or low-quality protein intolerances. The Six Fish formula is excellent for dogs with poultry sensitivies. However, most Orijen formulas use multiple protein sources (chicken, turkey, fish, etc.), which makes them unsuitable for dogs with multiple confirmed protein allergies. If your dog has complex allergies, you’d need a single-protein, limited-ingredient diet instead.
Use caution with senior dogs, especially if they’re less active. Orijen’s calorie density and 18-20% fat content are designed for active metabolism. Sedentary seniors may gain weight unless you’re vigilant about portion control. The Senior formula reduces calories and fat slightly, but it’s still richer than many senior-specific diets. If your older dog has mobility issues or is already overweight, a moderate-protein, lower-calorie food might be more appropriate.
No. Orijen’s 18-20% fat content is too high for dogs with pancreatitis or fat sensitivity. Even the Fit & Trim formula at 14.7% fat exceeds the 10-12% typically recommended for pancreatitis management. Dogs with compromised pancreatic function need prescription low-fat diets, not Orijen. If your dog has a history of pancreatitis, consult your vet about appropriate dietary options.
Champion Petfoods states that changes have been minimal, mostly related to ingredient sourcing and minor nutritional tweaks. However, some customers report palatability issues or reduced enthusiasm from their dogs starting around 2022. About 5-9% of recent reviews mention dogs who previously loved Orijen suddenly refusing it. Whether this reflects actual formula changes, batch variability, or other factors isn’t clear, but it’s a pattern worth noting.
Less than you might expect due to the calorie density. Orijen Original contains about 449 kcal per cup, so a 50-pound active dog needs roughly 2-2.5 cups daily versus 3-4 cups of a mid-tier brand. Always follow the feeding guidelines on the bag and monitor your dog’s body condition, especially during the first few weeks. It’s easy to overfeed when transitioning from a less dense food.
The FDA investigated potential links between grain-free, legume-heavy diets and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs, but no definitive causal relationship was established. Orijen conducted AAFCO feeding trials showing their grain-free diet maintained healthy taurine levels and overall health. If you’re concerned, the Amazing Grains line includes oats, quinoa, and chia seeds while maintaining 38-40% protein levels.
Orijen is made in two facilities: NorthStar Kitchen in Alberta, Canada and DogStar Kitchen in Auburn, Kentucky. The Kentucky facility handles most U.S. distribution and emphasizes regional sourcing—American farm meats and East Coast fish. Both facilities maintain SQF certification and HACCP protocols. Orijen has a clean recall history with no major incidents in over a decade.
Both are made by Champion Petfoods with similar philosophies, but Orijen has higher protein (38% vs 29%) and animal ingredient content (85% vs 60-65%). Orijen uses more fresh meats as primary ingredients, while Acana includes more meals. The price difference is about 15%—Orijen averages $4.20/lb versus Acana’s $3.60/lb. For most dogs, Acana delivers 80-90% of Orijen’s benefits at a more accessible price point.
The freeze-dried raw coating makes Orijen more aromatic and palatable than standard kibble. About 66% of owners report their dogs “love it,” including many previously picky eaters. The high meat content and minimal processing retain more natural flavors and smells that appeal to dogs. The Six Fish formula is particularly popular with finicky dogs due to the strong fish aroma.
9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food.
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
2,847+ dog owners already did
