9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
Shelter manager, certified canine nutritionist, and lifelong dog lover
• Cesar excels at palatability but fails on nutritional value – dogs love the taste, but ingredient quality doesn’t justify the premium $5-7 per pound pricing.
• Purpose-built for small dogs under 20 pounds – portion sizes and caloric density make it impractical and expensive for medium to large breeds.
• Contains controversial ingredients like artificial colors and synthetic preservatives – BHA, BHT, and artificial dyes serve no nutritional purpose and raise health concerns.
• Creates food dependency in picky eaters – while it solves appetite issues short-term, dogs often refuse other foods after becoming accustomed to Cesar.
• Better alternatives exist at similar price points – brands like Authority offer superior nutrition for less money, while fresh food delivers better quality.
Cesar traces its roots back to 1936 as Kal Kan Foods, a company that started by canning horse meat for dogs during the Depression era. By 1968, Mars Inc. had acquired the operation, and in 1989, the Cesar brand officially launched in the United States. Today, it’s part of Mars Petcare’s massive portfolio, which includes everything from Pedigree to Royal Canin.
The brand positions itself as premium wet food for small dogs, emphasizing palatability and convenience. Those single-serve trays are designed to make mealtime easy and appealing, especially for toy and small breeds. Cesar markets itself with a focus on “gourmet” flavors and real meat as the first ingredient, creating an image of indulgence and quality.
In practice, though, Cesar occupies a middle ground. It’s more expensive per pound than budget brands like Pedigree, but it doesn’t match the ingredient transparency or nutritional rigor of science-backed brands like Hill’s or Royal Canin. The brand’s reputation is split: dog owners love how readily their pets eat it, but nutritionists and reviewers often point out that palatability doesn’t always equal optimal nutrition.
Mars Petcare operates with stated commitments to sustainability and quality, including the world’s first LEED-Gold certified pet food facility in Fort Smith, Arkansas. The company employs over 85,000 people globally and maintains a relatively clean recall history—Cesar experienced one recall in 2016 due to potential plastic contamination, which was handled with full refunds.
Cesar lists real meat as the first ingredient in most recipes—chicken, beef, lamb, or turkey. On the surface, that sounds reassuring. But when you dig deeper, the meat content isn’t as substantial as it appears. Wet food is roughly 70-80% moisture, so that “real chicken” is mostly water. Once you calculate the dry matter basis, protein levels hover around 20-25%, which is respectable for wet food but not exceptional.
What concerns me more is what comes after that first ingredient. Many Cesar recipes include meat by-products—liver, giblets, and other organs. Now, organs aren’t inherently bad; they’re nutrient-dense. But “by-products” is a vague term that can include less desirable parts, and Mars doesn’t provide much transparency about sourcing or quality standards for these ingredients.
Cesar relies on ingredients like rice, wheat, and corn as carbohydrate sources. These aren’t necessarily harmful, but they’re not contributing much beyond calories and bulk. For dogs with grain sensitivities, this can be a dealbreaker. The brand does offer a limited Simply Crafted line with fewer ingredients, but it’s positioned more as a topper than a complete meal.
You’ll also find ingredients like soy flour and wheat gluten in some recipes. These are used to bind the loaf texture and boost protein numbers on paper, but they’re not high-quality protein sources and can trigger allergies in sensitive dogs.
Several ingredients raise red flags. Artificial colors like Yellow 5, Red 40, and Blue 2 show up in some recipes. These are added purely for human appeal—dogs don’t care what color their food is. While the FDA considers these additives safe, some studies have linked artificial dyes to behavioral issues, and many premium brands avoid them entirely.
Preservatives like BHA and BHT appear in certain formulas. These are synthetic antioxidants used to extend shelf life, but they’ve been flagged in animal studies for potential health risks. The World Health Organization classifies BHA as a possible carcinogen. Again, the doses in pet food are considered safe by regulators, but I’d prefer to see natural preservatives like mixed tocopherols instead.
| Price per pound | $5.00 – $7.00 |
| Primary protein | Chicken, Beef, Lamb, Turkey |
| By-products | Yes (liver, giblets, other organs) |
| AAFCO compliance | Yes (adult maintenance) |
| Formula options | Multiple lines (Classics, Simply Crafted, one puppy formula) |
| Availability | Widely available (Chewy, Walmart, Amazon) |
Cesar formulas meet AAFCO standards for adult maintenance, meaning they’re nutritionally complete for most adult dogs. One puppy formula exists, but the brand’s focus is clearly on adults and seniors. The guaranteed analysis on a typical Cesar Classics tray shows around 8-9% protein, 4-6% fat, and 1-2% fiber on an as-fed basis. Convert that to dry matter, and you’re looking at roughly 40-46% protein and 20-24% fat—decent numbers for wet food.
The caloric density is relatively low, around 70-90 kcal per 3.5 oz tray. That’s fine for small, less active dogs, but larger or more energetic dogs would need multiple trays to meet their daily needs, which gets expensive fast.
Micronutrient profiles are adequate but not standout. You’ll find added vitamins and minerals to meet AAFCO minimums, plus omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids for skin and coat health. However, there’s no glucosamine or chondroitin for joint support, no probiotics for gut health, and no functional ingredients targeting specific health concerns. This is a basic maintenance formula, not a therapeutic or performance diet.
One thing that stands out is the moisture content. Wet food naturally provides hydration, which is helpful for dogs who don’t drink enough water or have kidney issues. That’s a genuine benefit, though it’s not unique to Cesar.
Cesar shines for small and toy breeds. The portion sizes are designed for dogs under 20 pounds, and the soft texture works well for seniors or dogs with dental issues. If your Chihuahua or Yorkie is a picky eater, Cesar’s palatability often wins them over. The variety of flavors—filet mignon, rotisserie chicken, porterhouse steak—keeps mealtime interesting.
It’s also a practical choice for senior dogs who need softer food or have trouble chewing kibble. The high moisture content supports hydration, and the easy-to-digest texture is gentle on aging digestive systems. If your older dog has lost interest in food, Cesar can reignite their appetite.
For dogs who need a topper or appetite stimulant, Cesar works well mixed with dry food. The strong aroma and flavor can make a bland kibble more appealing, and the small trays make portion control straightforward.
Cesar isn’t ideal for large or highly active dogs. The caloric density is too low, so you’d need to feed multiple trays to meet energy needs, which becomes prohibitively expensive. A 60-pound active dog could easily need 6-8 trays a day—that’s not practical or cost-effective.
Dogs with grain sensitivities or allergies should avoid most Cesar formulas, which contain wheat, corn, and soy. The Simply Crafted line offers limited ingredients, but it’s not a complete diet on its own.
If your dog has specific health issues—kidney disease, pancreatitis, obesity—Cesar isn’t formulated to address those needs. You’d be better off with a veterinary diet like Hill’s Prescription or Royal Canin Veterinary.
Puppies of larger breeds should skip Cesar. While there’s one puppy formula, it’s not tailored for the growth needs of medium or large breeds, which require precise calcium-to-phosphorus ratios to support healthy bone development.
This is where Cesar truly excels. Dogs love it. In user reviews across platforms like Chewy, Walmart, and Amazon, roughly 82% of feedback is positive, with “my dog loves it” appearing in the majority of comments. Flavors like Filet Mignon, Rotisserie Chicken, and Porterhouse Steak consistently top the charts for acceptance.
For picky eaters, Cesar is often a relief. If your dog has turned their nose up at other brands, the strong aroma and savory flavor of Cesar frequently break through that resistance. Many owners report that their dogs start eating enthusiastically again after switching.
That said, palatability has a flip side. Some dogs become so attached to Cesar that they refuse other foods, which can create dependency. If you ever need to switch brands—due to cost, availability, or health needs—you might face a battle.
There are also reports of dogs refusing Cesar after a formula change in early 2024. Customers described a rancid smell and dogs turning away from food they’d previously loved. Mars didn’t publicly address the change, which frustrated many owners who felt blindsided.
Cesar is expensive for what you’re getting. At roughly $5 to $7 per pound, it’s priced in the premium range, but the ingredient quality doesn’t match that tier. You’re paying for convenience—those single-serve trays—and palatability, not for cutting-edge nutrition or transparent sourcing.
Compare Cesar to a brand like Dog food from Authority, which offers broader formulas with functional ingredients and better ingredient transparency at $2 to $3.50 per pound. Or look at fresh food brands like The Farmer’s Dog, which use human-grade ingredients and personalized nutrition for a comparable per-serving cost when you factor in portion control.
For a small dog eating one tray a day, Cesar costs around $2 to $3 daily, or $60 to $90 monthly. That’s manageable. But for a medium dog needing three trays, you’re looking at $180 to $270 a month—at that point, you could afford a premium kibble or even a fresh food subscription with better nutritional value.
If you’re using Cesar as a topper or occasional treat, the value proposition improves. Mixed with a quality dry food, it adds palatability without breaking the bank. But as a sole diet, especially for larger dogs, it’s hard to justify the cost against the nutritional return.
Cesar is manufactured by Mars Petcare at facilities across the United States, including the LEED-Gold certified plant in Fort Smith, Arkansas. That facility was the first pet food production site globally to achieve that level of environmental certification, reflecting commitments to water recycling, energy efficiency, and sustainable operations.
Mars claims adherence to HACCP protocols, Good Manufacturing Practices, and ISO 22000 standards. These are industry-standard quality controls covering everything from ingredient sourcing to microbial testing and batch traceability. In theory, that should mean consistent safety and quality.
In practice, transparency is limited. Mars doesn’t publicly share detailed sourcing information—where the chicken, beef, or grains come from, or what standards suppliers must meet. There’s no third-party testing data available to consumers, and no independent audits are published.
The recall history is relatively clean. Cesar experienced one voluntary recall in 2016 for potential plastic contamination in Filet Mignon Flavor wet food. Mars responded with full refunds and clear communication, which is the right approach. Compared to brands with multiple recalls or serious contamination issues, Cesar’s track record is reassuring.
However, the 2024 formula change controversy—where customers reported rancid smells and dogs refusing food—raises questions about quality consistency and communication. Mars didn’t publicly acknowledge the change or explain what happened, leaving customers frustrated and uncertain.
Mars Petcare has made some genuine sustainability commitments. The Fort Smith facility’s LEED-Gold certification demonstrates real investment in environmentally responsible manufacturing. The company also emphasizes reducing waste, recycling water, and minimizing carbon footprints across its operations.
That said, specific data is scarce. Mars doesn’t publish detailed sustainability reports for Cesar, so you can’t see concrete metrics on carbon emissions, water usage, or waste reduction. There’s no information about renewable energy use or long-term environmental goals with timelines.
Ingredient sourcing transparency is also lacking. Mars doesn’t disclose where its meat, grains, or other components come from, or what animal welfare standards suppliers must meet. There’s no mention of cage-free, free-range, or humanely raised claims on Cesar packaging.
Packaging is a mixed bag. The single-serve trays are convenient but generate more waste than larger cans or pouches. They’re not explicitly labeled as recyclable, and many consumers report throwing them in the trash. For environmentally conscious owners, that’s a downside.
Mars does support animal welfare initiatives broadly, including partnerships with shelters and adoption programs. But without detailed reporting specific to Cesar, it’s hard to assess the brand’s overall ethical footprint.
I work at a dog shelter, which gives me the chance to see how different foods perform with dogs of all backgrounds and temperaments. For this review, I tested Cesar Classics Filet Mignon Flavor with a dog named Biscuit, a seven-year-old Dachshund mix who came to us after his elderly owner passed away. Biscuit is a sweet, low-energy guy with a bit of a picky streak—he’d been refusing the shelter’s standard kibble and losing weight, which worried us.
When I first opened the Cesar tray, Biscuit’s reaction was immediate. His nose went up, his tail started wagging, and he trotted over with more enthusiasm than I’d seen from him in weeks. The first impression was clearly positive—the strong aroma got his attention right away.
For the first few days, Biscuit ate his Cesar meals eagerly. He cleaned the bowl every time, which was a relief after watching him pick at kibble. His energy didn’t change dramatically—he’s a laid-back dog by nature—but he seemed more content and settled after meals, like he was finally satisfied.
By the second week, I noticed his coat looked a bit shinier, though that could also be due to regular grooming and less stress in the shelter environment. His stools were firm and consistent, with no digestive upset, which is always a good sign when switching foods.
The one thing that stood out was how quickly Biscuit got attached to Cesar. When I tried mixing in some kibble to stretch the food further, he’d eat around the kibble and leave it behind. That’s the double-edged sword of Cesar’s palatability—it works so well that dogs can become reluctant to eat anything else.
Overall, Cesar did exactly what it’s designed to do for Biscuit: it got him eating again and helped him maintain a healthy weight. It wasn’t a miracle transformation, but for a dog who’d lost his appetite, it was a practical, effective solution.
Cesar’s user reviews paint a clear picture: dogs love the taste, but owners have mixed feelings about quality and value. Across platforms like Chewy, Walmart, and Amazon, the brand averages 4.7 to 4.8 out of 5 stars from thousands of reviews, with palatability dominating positive feedback.
Common praise includes “my dog finally eats,” “perfect for picky eaters,” and “shiny coat after a few weeks.” Owners of small breeds and seniors report the most success, with many saying Cesar is the only food their dog will consistently eat. Flavors like Filet Mignon and Rotisserie Chicken are frequently mentioned as favorites.
On the downside, negative reviews cluster around a few themes. Some dogs refuse Cesar entirely, which surprises owners given its reputation. Others report digestive issues—loose stools, gas, or vomiting—especially after switching from another food. A handful of reviews mention allergic reactions, with increased scratching or ear infections.
The 2024 formula change sparked significant backlash. Customers described a rancid smell and dogs refusing food they’d previously loved. Comments like “my dog won’t touch it anymore” and “what did you change?” appeared frequently. Mars didn’t publicly address the issue, which left many owners frustrated and questioning the brand’s reliability.
Price complaints are also common. Owners acknowledge the convenience and taste but feel the cost is too high for the ingredient quality. Phrases like “expensive for what it is” and “better options for the price” show up regularly.
One interesting pattern: Cesar works well as a short-term solution or appetite booster, but some owners hesitate to use it long-term due to nutritional concerns or cost. Many report using it as a topper or mixing it with kibble to balance palatability and value.
Cesar occupies a specific niche: premium-priced wet food for small dogs, with palatability as its primary selling point. But how does it stack up against alternatives?
Authority, PetSmart’s in-house brand, offers more variety and better value. At $2 to $3.50 per pound, Authority provides grain-free options, sensitive digestion formulas, and weight management recipes with transparent ingredients and AAFCO certification. While Authority may not match Cesar’s palatability for every dog, it delivers stronger nutritional value and broader suitability across life stages and sizes. Curious how they compare in detail? Check out our Authority dog food review.
Royal Canin and Hill’s Science Diet are positioned as science-backed, veterinary-recommended brands. They offer breed-specific and therapeutic formulas with rigorous research and clinical trials behind them. Cesar can’t compete on that level—it’s designed for taste, not targeted health outcomes. If your dog has specific medical needs, those brands are the better choice.
Freshpet and fresh food subscription services like The Farmer’s Dog or Ollie offer human-grade ingredients, personalized nutrition, and transparent sourcing. While they’re often more expensive per serving, the quality and digestibility are significantly higher. For owners willing to invest in fresh food, these brands outperform Cesar in almost every nutritional category.
Pedigree, another Mars brand, is cheaper and uses similar ingredients. If cost is your primary concern and your dog isn’t picky, Pedigree offers comparable nutrition at a fraction of the price. Cesar’s premium positioning is largely about convenience and flavor, not a meaningful upgrade in ingredient quality.
Cesar is purpose-built for small and toy breeds—think Chihuahuas, Yorkies, Dachshunds, and Pomeranians. The portion sizes, caloric density, and soft texture align perfectly with the needs of dogs under 20 pounds. If you have a small dog who’s a picky eater or struggles with dental issues, Cesar is a practical choice.
Senior dogs benefit from the soft texture and high moisture content, especially if they’ve lost teeth or have trouble chewing kibble. The palatability can reignite appetite in older dogs who’ve become disinterested in food, and the variety of flavors keeps meals interesting.
Cesar also works as a topper or appetite stimulant for dogs of any size. Mixed with dry food, it adds flavor and aroma without requiring a full switch. For dogs recovering from illness or surgery who need encouragement to eat, Cesar can be a helpful short-term tool.
However, Cesar is not suitable for large or highly active dogs. The caloric density is too low, and feeding enough trays to meet energy needs becomes impractical and expensive. It’s also not appropriate for dogs with grain sensitivities, allergies, or specific health conditions that require therapeutic diets.
Puppies of larger breeds should avoid Cesar. While there’s one puppy formula, it doesn’t provide the precise nutrition needed for healthy growth in medium to large breeds, which require carefully balanced calcium and phosphorus levels.
Here’s my honest take: Cesar is a convenience product designed for palatability, not optimal nutrition. If your small dog is a picky eater or you need a soft food for a senior, Cesar will likely get the job done. Dogs love the taste, the portion sizes are practical, and the variety keeps meals interesting. For those specific situations, it’s a reasonable choice.
But I wouldn’t call it “good” dog food in the broader sense. The ingredient quality doesn’t justify the premium price. You’re paying for convenience and flavor, not for transparent sourcing, functional ingredients, or cutting-edge nutrition. The inclusion of artificial colors, synthetic preservatives, and vague by-products raises questions, especially when competitors at similar or lower price points avoid those ingredients entirely.
Would I buy this for my own dog? Probably not as a primary diet. If I had a small, picky eater and nothing else worked, I’d consider it. But I’d also look at mixing it with a quality kibble or exploring fresh food options like Ollie or The Farmer’s Dog, which offer better ingredient transparency and nutritional value for a comparable cost per serving.
If a friend asked me about Cesar, I’d say this: It’s a solid short-term solution for palatability or appetite issues, but there are better long-term options if you care about ingredient quality and nutritional balance. For the price Cesar charges, you can find brands that deliver more—whether that’s Authority for better value, Royal Canin for science-backed formulas, or fresh food for human-grade ingredients.
Cesar does what it promises—dogs eat it, and they eat it enthusiastically. But in a market with so many strong alternatives, I think you can do better for your dog’s health and your wallet.
Cesar meets AAFCO nutritional standards and dogs love the taste, but it’s primarily designed for palatability rather than optimal nutrition. It works well for small, picky eaters and senior dogs who need soft food, but the ingredient quality doesn’t match the premium price point. You’re paying for convenience and flavor rather than cutting-edge nutrition or transparent sourcing.
At $5 to $7 per pound, Cesar’s high price reflects the convenience of single-serve trays and the palatability factor, not superior ingredient quality. You’re essentially paying a premium for portion control and taste appeal. For the same cost, you could often get better nutritional value from brands like Authority or even fresh food subscriptions.
Cesar isn’t practical for large or highly active dogs. The caloric density is too low, so a 60-pound active dog would need 6-8 trays daily, making it prohibitively expensive. It’s specifically designed for small dogs under 20 pounds. Large dogs would be better served with a quality kibble or fresh food option.
Yes, Cesar formulas are nutritionally complete and meet AAFCO standards for daily feeding. However, many nutrition experts suggest it works better as a topper or mixed with dry food to balance palatability with better ingredient quality and cost-effectiveness. As a sole diet long-term, there are more nutritious options available.
This became a common complaint in early 2024 when Mars apparently changed the formula. Many customers reported a rancid smell and dogs refusing food they’d previously loved. Mars didn’t publicly address the change, which left owners frustrated. Some dogs also become so attached to Cesar that they refuse other foods, creating dependency issues.
Cesar includes some controversial ingredients like artificial colors (Yellow 5, Red 40, Blue 2) and synthetic preservatives (BHA, BHT) in certain formulas. While the FDA considers these safe, many premium brands avoid them entirely. The World Health Organization classifies BHA as a possible carcinogen, though the doses in pet food are considered safe by regulators.
Most Cesar formulas contain wheat, corn, and soy, making them unsuitable for dogs with grain sensitivities. The brand does offer a Simply Crafted line with fewer ingredients, but it’s positioned as a topper rather than a complete meal. Dogs with specific allergies would be better served by prescription or limited-ingredient diets.
Cesar excels at palatability but lags in ingredient quality compared to competitors at similar price points. Authority offers better value at $2-3.50 per pound with more transparent ingredients. Royal Canin and Hill’s provide science-backed formulations. Fresh food brands like The Farmer’s Dog offer human-grade ingredients for comparable per-serving costs when you factor in portion control.
Cesar offers one puppy formula, but it’s not ideal for medium or large breed puppies who need precise calcium-to-phosphorus ratios for healthy bone development. It’s primarily designed for small adult dogs and seniors. Larger breed puppies should stick to formulas specifically designed for their growth needs.
Dogs can become so attached to Cesar’s palatability that they refuse other foods, creating a dependency issue. Many owners report their dogs eating around kibble when it’s mixed with Cesar or refusing meals when they try to switch brands. This is the double-edged sword of Cesar’s palatability – it works so well that it can create long-term feeding challenges.
9 out of 10 dog owners are feeding their dog the wrong food.
Take the free nutrition check and find out which food is best for your dog!
2,847+ dog owners already did
